Competition Law – IPR Interface: Impact on Innovation

Author: Vishvendra Tomar1.

  1. Law Student, Amity Law School-I, Noida []
  2. 65 U.S.P.Q. 1 (1945). []
  3. Image Technical Services., Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 125 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir.1997). []
  4. Bellsouth Advertising v. Donnelley, 719 F. Supp. 1551 (S.D. Fla. 1988); See also Intergraph Corporation v. Intel, 195 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 1999). []
  5. Nungesser v. Commissioner, [1983] 1 CMLR 278. []
  6. Coditel v. Cine Vog Films, [1983] 1 CMLR 49. []
  7. Huawei Technologies Co Ltd v ZTE Corp., Case C- 170/13. []
  8. IAN EAGLES & LOUISE LONGDIN, REFUSALS TO LICENSE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – TESTING OF THE LIMITS OF LAW AND ECONOMICS 105 (2011). []
  9. Amir Khan Productions Private Limited v. Union of India, W/P(C) no. 358 OF 2010; See also Kingfisher v. Competition Commission of India, W/P(C) no. 1785 of 2009. []
  10. M/s Best IT World (India) Private Limited (iBall) v. M/s Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ), Case No. 04 of 2015. []

Share this post:

Recent Posts